Prop 8 Proponents: Judge’s Decision Invalid Because He’s In a Gay Relationship

Prop 8 Proponents: Judge’s Decision Invalid Because He’s In a Gay Relationship

Be first to like this.
Translate this Story and earn Hornet Points!

Things are looking mighty desperate for the bigots across the gay marriage pond.

The Associate Press reports:

The sponsors of California’s same-sex marriage ban said Monday that the recent disclosure by the federal judge who struck down Proposition 8 that he is in a long-term relationship with another man has given them new grounds to have his historic ruling overturned.

Lawyers for the ban’s backers filed a motion in San Francisco’s U.S. District Court, arguing that Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker should have removed himself from the case or at least disclosed his relationship status because his “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

“Only if Chief Judge Walker had unequivocally disavowed any interest in marrying his partner could the parties and the public be confident that he did not have a direct personal interest in the outcome of the case,” attorneys for the coalition of religious and conservative groups that put Proposition 8 on the November 2008 ballot wrote.

Walker, a 67-year-old Republican appointee, declared Proposition 8 to be an unconstitutional violation of gay Californian’s civil rights last summer. He retired from the bench at the end of February.

Protect Marriage general counsel Andy Pugno said that changed when the judge this month told a group of courthouse reporters about his 10-year relationship. The issue is not that Walker is gay, but that his relationship status made him too similar to the same-sex couples who sued for the right to marry, Pugno said.

We deeply regret the necessity of this motion. But if the courts are to require others to follow the law, the courts themselves must do so as well,” Pugno added.

Walker said at the time that he did not consider his sexual orientation to be any more a reason for recusal than another judge’s race or gender normally would be.

Right. And are we correct in assuming that the group will also be filing motions for every single case relating to divorce that was presided over by a married person? And every single child custody decision arrived at by a parent? What’s that? No?

Then STFU and stop wasting the world’s time, homophobes. The majority of the country is in support of gay marriage now. Your obsession with our sex lives has become absolutely creepy.

Get over it.

Via AP

Related Stories

Queer Studies Professors Share Their Favorite Horror Movies of All Time
How 4 Non Blondes' 1992 Hit 'What’s Up?' Became a Modern Queer Anthem (Video)
Drag Spies And Gay Robots: 5 Queer Sci-Fi Films You May Have Missed
Just a Friendly Reminder That Jesus Was ... Well, a Little Gay
Female Trouble: 10 Unusual Horror Movies Directed by Women
This Artist Reimagined the Zodiac Signs as 12 Hunky Lumbersexuals
Here Are the 15 Pokémon That Totally Turned Me Gay
13 Films That Say 'Screw Romance' and Stab Love in the Eye Then Twist
Our Roundup of Films Where Bisexuals Aren't Portrayed as Villainous, Confused Creeps
A Brief History of Annoying Valentine’s Day Traditions
Send Your Lonely Friends a Bag of Dicks
The 20 Greatest Queer Video Game Characters of All Time
Quantcast