Yesterday, the Obama Administration stated its support of banning so-called “reparative therapy” (that is pseudo-psychological counseling focused on changing an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity) for minors. While the White House has not called for a federal ban, it does support state bans.
Unicorn Booty contributor Matt Baume takes a closer look at the battle to ban reparative therapy nationwide, its key players, and roadblocks.
It’s hard to know exactly what term to use to describe the practice: ex-gay therapy? Pray-away-the-gay? Conversion treatment? Sexual orientation change efforts?
Whatever you want to call it, experts agree: it’s not real. There’s no scientific basis for the idea that treatment in a clinical setting can control a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. And what’s more, the practice is actually harmful, and can cause severe mental health problems. Some practitioners have been accused or convicted of sexual assault under the guise of medical treatment.
So what would it take to stop it?
Two national organizations have taken the lead on banning conversion treatments: The Southern Poverty Law Center and The National Center for Lesbian Rights. SPLC has sued the organization JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing) over their treatment of several men who survived the ordeal. Former JONAH victims have described being forced to strip and masturbate in the presence of the JONAH staffer.
In their lawsuit, SPLC claims that JONAH violated New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act by claiming that they could change sexual orientation. None of the staff of JONAH are real therapists, and of course conversion efforts are not real therapy.
Meanwhile, NCLR has launched a campaign called “#BornPerfect.” Their goal is for conversion therapy to be banned across the country within the next five years. But they’re not taking a federal approach: only states can regulate medical treatment.
So instead, NCLR is pursuing state bans, which allows them to customize their efforts on a state-by-state basis. What works in California, after all, might not work in Mississippi.
It’s thanks in part to NLCR’s efforts that California was able to ban conversion treatments in 2012. New Jersey followed suit not long after. Legislators have also introduced bills in Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington DC, and Wisconsin.
NCLR has also lobbied the U.N. to support a nationwide ban.
“These types of bans need to progress throughout the nation as quickly as possible,” said former ex-gay Yvette Cantu Schneider. “Not only is the efficacy of change therapy dubious at best, but the type of therapy this legislation bans is specifically for minors.
“In my own life, that message kept me trapped in a cycle of believing that I was emotionally ill and incapable of having a healthy life until those things are fixed,” a former ex-gay leader named John Smid told BuzzFeed. “For over two decades, I lived in that mind-set. That’s why reparative therapy is so damaging. That was the message that I received and that I taught in my involvement with Exodus and Love in Action.”
Even though the federal government can’t regular medical professionals, says Staff Attorney Samantha Ames at NCLR, “there are many important roles for the federal government — encouraging states to enact law protecting LGBT children, preventing the use of federal funds to pay for these practices, ensuring that youth in federally-funded juvenile justice facilities are not subjected to conversion therapy, and educating parents and social service agencies about the dangers of trying to change a child’s sexual orientation or gender identity and the lifelong health benefits of family acceptance and support of LGBT youth.”
The bill died in committee in 2012, and again in 2013 despite having the support of 38 co-sponsors (all Democrats).
“Any effort to change sexual orientation is not medicine, it’s quackery, and we should not be supporting it with taxpayer dollars,” Speier said.
So far, Speier’s investigation has turned up at least one familiar name who took taxpayer money for torturing LGBTs: good old Marcus Bachmann, the definitely-not-homosexual husband of delusional former Congress member Michele Bachmann. Marcus accepted nearly $140,000 in Medicaid payments for his ex-gay clinic, and the investigation has turned up two more conversion-practitioners who may have taken federal money.
“Gay conversion has become a multimillion dollar industry,” Speier said. “So called therapists around the country prey on fearful parents who are willing to pay hundreds of dollars to make their children conform to heterosexual norms and expectations.”
If legislators did decide to go for one sweeping nationwide ban, resistance would likely come from Family-PAC Federal, a national PAC that pushes conservative policies. Rios was a featured speaker at the 2014 “Ex-Gay Awareness Conference” a few months ago, and is the Vice President of Family-Pac.
Christopher Doyle would also be likely to lead federal lobbying efforts. Doyle is the co-founder of “Voice of the Voiceless,” and previously called for federal recognition of ex-gays as a protected class. Doyle has also admitted to sexually abusing other children when he was 10.
The best chance that pro-conversion groups have of overturning those state bans is suing on the basis of religious freedom — but that avenue has already been cut off. After New Jersey banned the practice, several people sued the state. But a federal judge ruled that such laws only regulate conduct, not speech. In other words, they can talk about conversion, they just can’t try to offer it as therapy.
“This law will save lives by protecting young people them from these horrible and damaging practices,” said Troy Stevenson, Executive Director of Garden State Equality, after the judge ruled.
So if you’re in California or New Jersey, great! Therapists are already banned from trying to change anyone’s sexual orientation. Numerous other states are likely to follow that lead. The only question is whether NCLR will actually manage to hit their five-year goal; and how vehemently the remaining ex-gays practitioners will try to defend their abusive treatments.
Read more stories by just signing up
or Download the App to read the latest stories