This Gay Veteran Is Suing the U.S. Military for Discriminating Against HIV-Positive Servicemembers

This Gay Veteran Is Suing the U.S. Military for Discriminating Against HIV-Positive Servicemembers

Be first to like this.
Translate this Story and earn Hornet Points!

Nick Harrison (pictured above), an openly gay, HIV-positive veteran of the D.C. Army National Guard, is suing the U.S. Department of Defense over a policy that’s basically a military HIV ban. The policy, nicknamed “Deploy or Get Out,” states HIV-positive military service members can’t be deployed to military posts outside of the United States for more than a year. As such, HIV-positive military members can be immediately discharged from the military, prohibited from being appointed as officers or even prevented from enlisting altogether, as they’re not allowed to serve abroad for as long as others.

Nick Harrison and his lawyers argue that the policy is based on an outdated understanding of HIV and violates the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guaranteeing all citizens due process and equal protection under the law. (That is, you can’t treat HIV-positive Americans differently than HIV-negative Americans.)

In fact, in their legal filing, Harrison’s lawyers pointed out that a 25-year-old with HIV who is quickly diagnosed and under medical treatment has a lifespan almost identical to a 25-year-old without HIV.

They also pointed out that the military regularly allows people with other comparable chronic illnesses and manageable medical conditions to enlist and travel abroad.

“These oppressive restrictions are based on antiquated science that reinforces stigma and denies perfectly qualified service members the full ability to serve their country,” said Scott Schoettes, Harrison’s legal counsel and HIV Project Director at Lambda Legal, a legal LGBTQ rights organization. “Recruitment, retention, deployment and commissioning should be based on a candidate’s qualifications to serve, not unfounded fears about HIV.”

The military HIV ban makes even less sense when you consider the thousands of dollars and immense amounts of hands-on training required to train a soldier. Dismissing soldiers when they become HIV-positive effectively throws that money away, and denying prospective recruits or potential officers based on their HIV status furthers no compelling government interest other than a desire to discriminate, plain and simple.

What do you think of Nick Harrison’s case against the U.S. military HIV ban? Sound off in the comments.

Related Stories

Drag Spies And Gay Robots: 5 Queer Sci-Fi Films You May Have Missed
The 20 Greatest Queer Video Game Characters of All Time
13 Films That Say 'Screw Romance' and Stab Love in the Eye Then Twist
Simple Infographic Explains Why Having a Trans Day of Visibility Is So Important
Rock Hudson, Years Later: Has Hollywood Made Any Progress Dealing With HIV?
The Unreal Story of Claude Cahun, the Lesbian Photographer Who Fought Off the Nazis
Just a Friendly Reminder That Jesus Was ... Well, a Little Gay
Female Trouble: 10 Unusual Horror Movies Directed by Women
Queer Studies Professors Share Their Favorite Horror Movies of All Time
These 20 Terrifying Christmas Monsters Will Haunt Your Holidays
From the Science of Sex to Nazi Destroyers, 11 of the Coolest Queer People in Science
Read Martin Luther King Jr.'s Advice to a Closeted Teen