Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has No Plans to Retire, Allowing Us All to Breathe a Sigh of Relief

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has No Plans to Retire, Allowing Us All to Breathe a Sigh of Relief

Be first to like this.
Translate this Story and earn Hornet Points!

Racist and anti-LGBTQ U.S. President Donald Trump has already gotten to nominate two judges to the U.S. Supreme Court. And with huge civil rights issues set to approach the court — namely, questions on whether businesses can legally refuse to serve LGBTQ people and whether presidents can be subject to criminal investigations — liberals have made a collective sigh of relief upon Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg saying that she won’t retire for another five years (until she’s age 90). A far-off Ruth Bader Ginsburg retirement is good news because her octogenarian vote is possibly the only thing separating Americans from living in a corrupt, theocratic hellhole.

The Ruth Bader Ginsburg retirement announcement came at a New York City showing of the The Originalist, a play about deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a mouthy anti-LGBTQ troll who died in 2016.

Speaking after the show, Ginsburg reportedly said, “I’m now 85. My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years.”

Stevens is 98 years old. He retired in 2010 and was replaced by Elena Kagan, an appointee of then U.S. President Barack Obama.

Because American democracy is so screwed up — with endless amounts of “dark money” fueling political campaigns and gerrymandered maps favoring rural conservative voters far more than urban progressive ones — liberal Americans have had to rely on the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve our most divisive political issues like whether it’s okay to deny people of color their voting rights (it is, apparently).

RELATED | 3 Years After Giving Gays the Right to Marry, the U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Islamophobia

So while Trump’s most recent Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh goes through the Senate confirmation process, several consequential cases are working their way through the judicial system including ones in which yet another marriage business refused to serve a same-sex couple on the basis of “sincerely held religious beliefs” and a federal court case that could determine whether it’s legal to fire someone just for being gay.

Do you think the Ruth Bader Ginsburg retirement will happen in 2023, or can she hold on even longer?

Related Stories

Simple Infographic Explains Why Having a Trans Day of Visibility Is So Important
How 4 Non Blondes' 1992 Hit 'What’s Up?' Became a Modern Queer Anthem (Video)
These 20 Terrifying Christmas Monsters Will Haunt Your Holidays
Drag Spies And Gay Robots: 5 Queer Sci-Fi Films You May Have Missed
The Unreal Story of Claude Cahun, the Lesbian Photographer Who Fought Off the Nazis
From the Science of Sex to Nazi Destroyers, 11 of the Coolest Queer People in Science
Read Martin Luther King Jr.'s Advice to a Closeted Teen
Here Are the 15 Pokémon That Totally Turned Me Gay
13 Films That Say 'Screw Romance' and Stab Love in the Eye Then Twist
The U.S. Feds Tried To Kill The First Gay Magazine
Queer Studies Professors Share Their Favorite Horror Movies of All Time
The New York Public Library's Archives Are a Treasure Trove of Queer History
Quantcast