Jordan Peele’s Follow-Up ‘Us’ Could Prove to Be the Year’s Most Divisive Film

Jordan Peele’s Follow-Up ‘Us’ Could Prove to Be the Year’s Most Divisive Film

Be first to like this.

Us, the follow-up to Jordan Peele’s Oscar-winning and zeitgeist-capturing debut Get Out, has had so much critical and audience pre-release buzz you’d think it would wilt under the weight of those expectations. It’s a crackerjack horror thriller about a damaged family haunted by their doppelgängers (“the Tethered”) while on vacation near Santa Cruz, and it’s stuffed to the brim with ideas about political divisiveness, class inequality and our own warring internal impulses. It’s audacious, entertaining, ludicrous and head-scratching.

That’s not to suggest that the ride isn’t fun. Half the kick of watching Us is trying to piece together the elements that Jordan Peele presents to you, and it would do a disservice to the viewer to get too specific regarding plot points.

All you need to know going in we’ve already stated. The Wilson family — dad Gabe (Winston Duke), mom Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o), daughter Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and son Jason (Evan Alex) — are interrupted in their rustic vacation home by evil versions of themselves. There’s a pre-present day sequence set on the Santa Cruz pier in 1986 involving the young Adelaide that encompasses Hands Across America, a homeless guy with a cardboard sign that reads “Jeremiah 11:11” and a creepy beachfront haunted attraction with a maze of funhouse mirrors. It’s here where she first meets her Tethered self, Red. (All of the actors playing the family also play their doubles.)

On board for the fun are Elizabeth Moss and Tim Heidecker as family friends Kitty and Josh Tyler, and their teenage twin daughters (Cali and Noelle Sheldon) and a bunch of rabbits that live amongst the Tethered in their underground world, whose metaphorical import completely escapes me. (No doubt there will be plenty of reviews and blogs devoted to unravelling the layers of meaning Peele intends.)

It’s no coincidence the film relies much on the use of the funhouse mirrors. The movie itself is one big funhouse mirror that taunts you to figure out which is the real thing and which is the distorted view. My own reaction to the film is split. I loved a lot about it — the confidence of the directing, the fantastic performances Peele elicits from everyone (but, most especially, Nyong’o and Moss), the sly digs at partisanship and the need for togetherness. Yet I was also disappointed when it was over. It’s ambiguous to the point of frustration, and I’m confident there will be just as many naysayers as there will be fans.

“The big question here for me, in my second feature,” Jordan Peele has said, “is what do you hang onto as a signature style and what do you differently?” His directorial instincts are superb — he knows how to combine humor with horror organically, and his fantastical moments (the Sunken Place in Get Out, the abandoned underground subway systems where the Tethered live in Us) are both crazy and sneakily right.

Yet where Get Out was airtight in its point of view, its exploration of racial micro-aggressions and its specificity of setting and conflict, Us — while effectively scary — is murky. It does cartwheels to explain itself to you while you’re watching it, and it falls apart when you poke holes in its logic.

Yet Peele, who has proven his mettle as an artist in his first two films, has given us something to examine, obsess over, argue about. Love it, hate it, swing wildly between both of those poles — its divided soul is the perfect reflection of where we are right now.

Us, directed by Jordan Peele, is in theaters now.

Related Stories

Does the Porn of Ancient Pompeii Help Prove the New Testament Isn't Anti-Gay After All?
We Asked This Gay Doctor All of Our Poppers-Related Questions
The Next Time You Crave Chicken, Remember That Chick-fil-A Is Still Very Much Anti-Gay
New Doc BALONEY Takes You Behind the Curtain of SF's Sexy Queer Striptease Troupe